I have recently added all the old notes I had on the website known as "facebook" that were written as blog entries.
I hope that anyone who reads this blog also takes the time to view the "October 7" section as there is a lot of variety.
I apologize for the rather "emo" like blog entries that were my first two entries. As of right now my priority is NOT so much to add new posts as it is to get my blog out into the digi-world and to add photos.
I HOPE PEOPLE ENJOY THIS!!!!!!!! It will get better and I promise, I can promise because I am a perfectionist.
Points of view, "politiks", revolutionary technologies... basically anything goes
Thursday, October 7, 2010
If we didn't have money... we'd be living in a world where everyone drives their own custom concept cars
Check this out.. this is how Money fails at being progressive:The FBI pays it's informants (anyone who gives information to the FBI deemed useful to them gets paid). Problem here? Much. This motivates people to just simply lie about things.. or not even lie. But if a person who disagrees with another person's views reports that other person than they can be considered a threat... either way, it means that monetary interests are behind "fighting terrorism" and so the problem is not getting dealt with.
Interesting point: Terrorism wouldn't exist if money didn't.
This is because ALL "terrorism" cases are actually normal citizens choosing to revolt, usually violently, although we are now seeing rising cases of apparent "nonviolent terrorism" with the FBI raiding the homes of peace activists. Anyways, people only revolt when their needs are not met.. thus capitalism is causing their sorrows and, naturally, capitalism breeds terrorism.
Now how does this tie into a moneyless world where everyone drives their own custom made vehicles that look like concept cars?
Simple
Without money's ability to blind people about where things come from and how the world is affected by consumption... people would be required to operate off of "Resource-based economy" using resources only when needed. When you have an "economy" that give to those who need it most.... you get a LOT of left over stuff. Therefore you have extra.. this is called "Abundance." And then the next stage sets in..
Without money you NEED a "Gift Economy".. that means you NEED to share and sharing is the single-most effective means of humans existing... Although this idea is hardly a new idea, it is very difficult for U.S. Americans to grasp.
Factories would not operate like factories.. they would operate like websites.. the "consumer" using them whenever they wish, the resources and operations being readily accessible. They can custom design anything they want, the computer system will fill in all the hard bits.. the computer system being designed by other factories of course and by the people who build these things. All these "factories" are environmental friendly and produce only devices and goods that are either biodegradable or 100% recyclable.
There would be no reason to buy things... You just have things.. ownership would not exist.. sharing is essential.
You're car can be fast, and it can be free, and it will consume no energy resources whatsoever because it creates its own energy with its own kinetic energy.
You would have whatever you like... even though you would see in this society that people often don't care about material things since they get enough of it... they care about people and each other.
If only....
PHOTO CREDITS: http://www.virtualcar.it/bmw-supercar-concept-by-emil-baddal/ by designer Emil Baddal
What the future of the "United" States of America may look like
In the Future... the nation commonly referred to as "America" will be known as "The States of America" as it's nickname.
What will this SOA look like?
It will be missing a very large chunk of it's upper Northwest and Pacific Coast. This territory would be known as The Republic of Cascadia. See here: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascadia_(independence_movement)#Boundaries)
There shall possibly be a large missing chunk of the midwest missing.. as the Lakotah people form their own independence inside the states of Montana, Wyoming, Nebraska, and the Dakotas. Republic of Lakotah. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Lakotah
Vermont may be it's own country. Its Middlebury Institute has hosted the First North American Secessionist Convention. The institute has dedicated its studies to secession, separatism, and self-determination. Vermont would be known as The Second Republic of Vermont http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Vermont_Republic
Texas is a state who's membership in the Union has a contract agreement.. it goes a little like what this guy said
"Regarding secession of a state, there is a theory about how Texas could “secede” from the United States. In the agreement with the U.S. when it became a state Texas has the right, through a vote, to divide into five separate states. It’s theorized that if this was to happen it would be challenged in the courts by the U. S., making it to the Supreme Court. It’s then theorized that they would not allow Texas to become five states, because it would give them so many seats in the Senate (ten versus two). Therefore the Supreme Court would have to deny this, which would then nullify and void the agreement that brought Texas into the union. This would allow Texas a separate nation."
from http://www.kevindhendricks.com/2006/08/08/can-a-state-secede-from-the-us/
If the State succeeded at this it would be known as (obviously) The Republic of Texas.
Hawaiians would protest the illegal annexation of their Republic to the Union and perhaps win.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaiian_sovereignty_movement
Although no movements or actions have been recorded, The North Star Republic is an organization centered in Minneapolis, MN and advocates the idea of a socialist republic secession of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and the Northern Peninsula of Michigan.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Star_Republic
Along with the far left, there is the far right. The League of the South is another organization going along with the rejuvenation of the Confederacy. Considering the cultural canyon between the South and most other states.. this is a possibility. Although this group is considered a hate-group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_the_South
Primary Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secession_in_the_United_States#Recent_efforts_in_the_United_States
California could become the first state to successfully secede. As the 7th largest economy in the world (if California was considered an independent country) and plans already under the Pentagon's table for "how to deal with a Southern Californian military rebellion" there is a realistic possibility of secession. (I got that last fact from a Popular Mechanics magazine)
Combining the The California Republic with the The Republic of Cascadia.. you will notice that the entire Pacific Coast is no longer in the hands of the "New United States of America."
The Republic of Cascadia is a transnational movement which means it involves both secession from the United States AND Canada. The best way to implement this would be to secede from each country independently, then merge afterwards.
There will be a large hole in the center the United States. This is the The Republic of Lakotah.
Texas will either be partitioned into five new states, each with two seats in the Senate, giving the whole "State" a very large amount of voting power, or it will be its own independent Republic of Texas.
Not too far off would be the missing states of the Great Lakes. The economically powerful State of Minnesota combined with the welfare state of Wisconsin and the rich and exotic Northern Peninsula, are all gone from the Union in their own North Star Republic.
If the Southern states aren't missing from the map, then they are rogue states who are only "Officially" part of the United States, otherwise completely governing themselves, possibly even rejecting Federal funding.
Closer to homebase is Vermont and a possible joining of all of New England in the movement towards secession. Their liberal culture wasn't suitable for the empire.
Remembering that Hawaii is missing completes the picture.. an oddly compiled mess of the new United States. With The Cascadia Republic so close to the Lakotah republic, and bordering the California Republic, The North Star Republic only a few hundred miles from the Lakotah Republic and having waterway access to Canada, and with California's already high traffic with Hawaii, it is well foreseeable that these independent nations not only COULD exist, but that they could exist in prosperity. With the people of these regions already displaying their interests in medium scale ways.. such a futurist's predictions are well assumed.
The questions remain, will these places ever take root? Are there other republics looming in people's minds all throughout modern-day USA that are just waiting for the perfect day? How will the District of Colombia-government take all this?
No question of possibility can be answered without experience.
What will this SOA look like?
It will be missing a very large chunk of it's upper Northwest and Pacific Coast. This territory would be known as The Republic of Cascadia. See here: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascadia_(independence_movement)#Boundaries)
There shall possibly be a large missing chunk of the midwest missing.. as the Lakotah people form their own independence inside the states of Montana, Wyoming, Nebraska, and the Dakotas. Republic of Lakotah. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Lakotah
Vermont may be it's own country. Its Middlebury Institute has hosted the First North American Secessionist Convention. The institute has dedicated its studies to secession, separatism, and self-determination. Vermont would be known as The Second Republic of Vermont http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Vermont_Republic
Texas is a state who's membership in the Union has a contract agreement.. it goes a little like what this guy said
"Regarding secession of a state, there is a theory about how Texas could “secede” from the United States. In the agreement with the U.S. when it became a state Texas has the right, through a vote, to divide into five separate states. It’s theorized that if this was to happen it would be challenged in the courts by the U. S., making it to the Supreme Court. It’s then theorized that they would not allow Texas to become five states, because it would give them so many seats in the Senate (ten versus two). Therefore the Supreme Court would have to deny this, which would then nullify and void the agreement that brought Texas into the union. This would allow Texas a separate nation."
from http://www.kevindhendricks.com/2006/08/08/can-a-state-secede-from-the-us/
If the State succeeded at this it would be known as (obviously) The Republic of Texas.
Hawaiians would protest the illegal annexation of their Republic to the Union and perhaps win.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaiian_sovereignty_movement
Although no movements or actions have been recorded, The North Star Republic is an organization centered in Minneapolis, MN and advocates the idea of a socialist republic secession of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and the Northern Peninsula of Michigan.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Star_Republic
Along with the far left, there is the far right. The League of the South is another organization going along with the rejuvenation of the Confederacy. Considering the cultural canyon between the South and most other states.. this is a possibility. Although this group is considered a hate-group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_the_South
Primary Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secession_in_the_United_States#Recent_efforts_in_the_United_States
California could become the first state to successfully secede. As the 7th largest economy in the world (if California was considered an independent country) and plans already under the Pentagon's table for "how to deal with a Southern Californian military rebellion" there is a realistic possibility of secession. (I got that last fact from a Popular Mechanics magazine)
Combining the The California Republic with the The Republic of Cascadia.. you will notice that the entire Pacific Coast is no longer in the hands of the "New United States of America."
The Republic of Cascadia is a transnational movement which means it involves both secession from the United States AND Canada. The best way to implement this would be to secede from each country independently, then merge afterwards.
There will be a large hole in the center the United States. This is the The Republic of Lakotah.
Texas will either be partitioned into five new states, each with two seats in the Senate, giving the whole "State" a very large amount of voting power, or it will be its own independent Republic of Texas.
Not too far off would be the missing states of the Great Lakes. The economically powerful State of Minnesota combined with the welfare state of Wisconsin and the rich and exotic Northern Peninsula, are all gone from the Union in their own North Star Republic.
If the Southern states aren't missing from the map, then they are rogue states who are only "Officially" part of the United States, otherwise completely governing themselves, possibly even rejecting Federal funding.
Closer to homebase is Vermont and a possible joining of all of New England in the movement towards secession. Their liberal culture wasn't suitable for the empire.
Remembering that Hawaii is missing completes the picture.. an oddly compiled mess of the new United States. With The Cascadia Republic so close to the Lakotah republic, and bordering the California Republic, The North Star Republic only a few hundred miles from the Lakotah Republic and having waterway access to Canada, and with California's already high traffic with Hawaii, it is well foreseeable that these independent nations not only COULD exist, but that they could exist in prosperity. With the people of these regions already displaying their interests in medium scale ways.. such a futurist's predictions are well assumed.
The questions remain, will these places ever take root? Are there other republics looming in people's minds all throughout modern-day USA that are just waiting for the perfect day? How will the District of Colombia-government take all this?
No question of possibility can be answered without experience.
Magic
Magic is poetry that is written not with ink, but instead with the very elements of life and experience.
Life works in mysterious ways, like magic. Once one understands what magic is, through poetry and spirituality, underlying structure in chaos, and sociology, one can make life work in mysterious ways. It is that creative plan that one has the potential to develop that gives life the meaning that we all seek to discover and experience.
Luck is the chance of positive or negative influences on one's life. To declare luck as superstition is to declare that Sociology is false, which is untrue. Luck exists as the definition of being the accidental happenings of one's life due to the influence of the environment and other people. In this respect we, as human beings on this planet, are constantly experiencing luck, although most luck could be "classified" as neutral luck that yields no significant changes in our lives. Because luck is so closely associated with Sociology and the larger philosophy of Spirituality (what I am referring to is the co-dependency of all life and non-life systems) luck is also dependent on the path that nature follows. This means that positive (beneficial) energies (energy can be light, electricity, or patterns of these energies, or ergonomics, etc) are typically effective in inducing, if you will, "good luck."
Hense: Feng shui - the Chinese philosophy of luck
Life works in mysterious ways, like magic. Once one understands what magic is, through poetry and spirituality, underlying structure in chaos, and sociology, one can make life work in mysterious ways. It is that creative plan that one has the potential to develop that gives life the meaning that we all seek to discover and experience.
Luck is the chance of positive or negative influences on one's life. To declare luck as superstition is to declare that Sociology is false, which is untrue. Luck exists as the definition of being the accidental happenings of one's life due to the influence of the environment and other people. In this respect we, as human beings on this planet, are constantly experiencing luck, although most luck could be "classified" as neutral luck that yields no significant changes in our lives. Because luck is so closely associated with Sociology and the larger philosophy of Spirituality (what I am referring to is the co-dependency of all life and non-life systems) luck is also dependent on the path that nature follows. This means that positive (beneficial) energies (energy can be light, electricity, or patterns of these energies, or ergonomics, etc) are typically effective in inducing, if you will, "good luck."
Hense: Feng shui - the Chinese philosophy of luck
Shamanism - Native American Taoism?
Shamanism is the only universal "religion"; it is a spiritual practice that has spontaneously started in various tribes around the world.. usually in different names such as Buddhism and Taoism. It's universal because it started out of nowhere with no prophets and no underline reason, and in places that were separated from each other by massive oceans or treacherous lands.
Some evidence has linked the famous Jesus Christ's 13-30 year missing segment of his life with an outsider who came into the Buddists of the mountains of western Asia. Such controversial information has been viciously suffocated to prevent general awareness of such a possibility.. luckily the internet was created.
"The Unkown Life of Jesus Christ" is a book I have yet to read and I think I will enjoy it.
Some evidence has linked the famous Jesus Christ's 13-30 year missing segment of his life with an outsider who came into the Buddists of the mountains of western Asia. Such controversial information has been viciously suffocated to prevent general awareness of such a possibility.. luckily the internet was created.
"The Unkown Life of Jesus Christ" is a book I have yet to read and I think I will enjoy it.
"Monster Magnet" views on drugs
Dave Wyndorf (Wikipedia)
Wyndorf believes that drugs are not an inspiration for music nor a gateway into creativity. He has stated that he has never written songs on drugs and that he thinks that those artists who have done so, would have made better music if they hadn't composed while being on drugs. In a 1995 interview Wyndorf stated that legalizing mushrooms in America might be a bad idea stating "Americans have been so suppressed for so long that given that kind of freedom they would tend to abuse it".
Born on the 28 October of 1956 in the suburban community where he'd be raised, Red Bank, New Jersey, Dave Wyndorf is one of eight children from a lower-middle-class Catholic family. Early in life, he was influenced greatly by the record collection belonging to his older brother, by seeing a UFO with his mother and two sisters, and by going to a Hawkwind concert in New York. He also discovered comic books -a medium that continues to provide ideas for his songs- as well as sex and drugs. Wyndorf lost his virginity at 13. At 14, Wyndorf started selling pot; by 20, he was using LSD and cocaine regularly. Later, he became an alcoholic. Wyndorf would give up drugs and drinking in 1995.
On February 27, 2006, Dave overdosed on prescription drugs. An upcoming European tour for Monster Magnet was subsequently canceled. His management released the following statement:
The battle with one’s inner demons is the most personal fight any of us can undertake. The fight is at times a lonely, confusing journey. On the evening of February 27, Dave Wyndorf suffered a setback in his own fight and was hospitalized due to a drug overdose. His full recovery is expected. We ask that all those he has encountered over the years or simply affected by his music to take a moment to think good thoughts of and for him and his son Reece Flair. With the grace of God and those who love him we are all confident that Dave will rebound from this set back and continue to play and make great rock and roll.
Wyndorf believes that drugs are not an inspiration for music nor a gateway into creativity. He has stated that he has never written songs on drugs and that he thinks that those artists who have done so, would have made better music if they hadn't composed while being on drugs. In a 1995 interview Wyndorf stated that legalizing mushrooms in America might be a bad idea stating "Americans have been so suppressed for so long that given that kind of freedom they would tend to abuse it".
Born on the 28 October of 1956 in the suburban community where he'd be raised, Red Bank, New Jersey, Dave Wyndorf is one of eight children from a lower-middle-class Catholic family. Early in life, he was influenced greatly by the record collection belonging to his older brother, by seeing a UFO with his mother and two sisters, and by going to a Hawkwind concert in New York. He also discovered comic books -a medium that continues to provide ideas for his songs- as well as sex and drugs. Wyndorf lost his virginity at 13. At 14, Wyndorf started selling pot; by 20, he was using LSD and cocaine regularly. Later, he became an alcoholic. Wyndorf would give up drugs and drinking in 1995.
On February 27, 2006, Dave overdosed on prescription drugs. An upcoming European tour for Monster Magnet was subsequently canceled. His management released the following statement:
The battle with one’s inner demons is the most personal fight any of us can undertake. The fight is at times a lonely, confusing journey. On the evening of February 27, Dave Wyndorf suffered a setback in his own fight and was hospitalized due to a drug overdose. His full recovery is expected. We ask that all those he has encountered over the years or simply affected by his music to take a moment to think good thoughts of and for him and his son Reece Flair. With the grace of God and those who love him we are all confident that Dave will rebound from this set back and continue to play and make great rock and roll.
My Philosophy
Life... can only be worth living once a value has been attained. It is the pursuit of this value that drives me. If I believed this pursuit to be moot, I would be driven to find the most elegant, and dramatic way of death, as there would not be a one thing in this world more glamorous. Value comes not from material, material can only be a representation of value. But it is this hoarding of a represented value that causes us to ignore its original purpose: To create a better world for us all. Money has lost its representing of value. Value can only be achieved through all forms of love and human relationships, unconditionally; and the sharing of knowledge and wisdom. Value is in people and in the social realm of things, as truly there is no thing that is not at least somewhat social. Therefore the biggest threat to our civilizations, societies, communities, and families... is individualism. That is, the ignoring of our social selves, the opposite of cooperation and helpfulness, of kindliness and compassion.
This is the only reasoning that drives my life. This is the only thing that needs to drive my life.
This is the only reasoning that drives my life. This is the only thing that needs to drive my life.
Why Hillary Clinton is dumb
The original date for this is: April 20th, 2010
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: “We are deeply concerned about the behavior of the Venezuelan government, which we think is unproductive with respect to its relations with certain neighbors, which we believe is limiting slowly, but surely, the freedoms within Venezuela, therefore adversely impacting the Venezuelan people. And we would hope that there could be a new start on the part of the Venezuelan leadership to restore full democracy, to restore freedom of the press, to restore private property, and return to a free market economy. We wish Venezuela were looking more to its south and looking at Brazil and looking at Chile.”
"...which we believe is limiting slowly, but surely, the freedoms within Venezuela, therefore adversely impacting the Venezuelan people."
-- The words of pre-war
"...to restore private property, and return to a free market economy."
-- Venezuela PEOPLE don't want private property. Venezuela PEOPLE don't want a free market.
Brazil is in an unofficial civil war and Chile is one of the most impoverished nations in the world...
If you fight Hugo Chavez then it is not him you must worry about, it is the entire country of the Venezuelan people that you will be fighting. It is the Venezuelan Embassy of Washington D.C. that you will be at war with. It is human rights and the future that you will be attacking.
Hillary Clinton works. She is a puppet, albeit an influential puppet.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: “We are deeply concerned about the behavior of the Venezuelan government, which we think is unproductive with respect to its relations with certain neighbors, which we believe is limiting slowly, but surely, the freedoms within Venezuela, therefore adversely impacting the Venezuelan people. And we would hope that there could be a new start on the part of the Venezuelan leadership to restore full democracy, to restore freedom of the press, to restore private property, and return to a free market economy. We wish Venezuela were looking more to its south and looking at Brazil and looking at Chile.”
"...which we believe is limiting slowly, but surely, the freedoms within Venezuela, therefore adversely impacting the Venezuelan people."
-- The words of pre-war
"...to restore private property, and return to a free market economy."
-- Venezuela PEOPLE don't want private property. Venezuela PEOPLE don't want a free market.
Brazil is in an unofficial civil war and Chile is one of the most impoverished nations in the world...
If you fight Hugo Chavez then it is not him you must worry about, it is the entire country of the Venezuelan people that you will be fighting. It is the Venezuelan Embassy of Washington D.C. that you will be at war with. It is human rights and the future that you will be attacking.
Hillary Clinton works. She is a puppet, albeit an influential puppet.
Strategy to have more clever speech
Think about what you are going to say... Now take all the key words and think of synonyms for those words. train yourself to do this within milliseconds.
Your words will radiate through their heads like vibrations on a spiderweb.
Puns are good if only used properly. Many puns challenge people to think more, which is enjoyed. And then some puns when placed properly, can actually be funny. Otherwise simple puns are a nag on the brain and should not be used.
Keep things simple and/or short as possible.
Your words will radiate through their heads like vibrations on a spiderweb.
Puns are good if only used properly. Many puns challenge people to think more, which is enjoyed. And then some puns when placed properly, can actually be funny. Otherwise simple puns are a nag on the brain and should not be used.
Keep things simple and/or short as possible.
ADD/ADHD is a lie
Wow it's amazing how the MYTH of ADD/ADHD article makes a WHOLE lot more sense than the official medical journals of what ADD/ADHD is.. People, ADD/ADHD is not a physical disorder it is a mental imbalance that can be fixed by simply being polite to your children. I was this victim. Why have the rates of ADD/ADHD been on the rise? over 60% of high schoolers seem to be diagnosed with it. I don't think half the human population on the planet has a physical disorder. Damn!
Those pills did nothing for me, they made life easier....temporarily. But you can't fix a problem in your life with drugs, regardless of what many seem to believe.
the Links:
http://www.thomasarmstrong.com/myth_add_adhd.htm
http://www.adhdfraud.org/
Those pills did nothing for me, they made life easier....temporarily. But you can't fix a problem in your life with drugs, regardless of what many seem to believe.
the Links:
http://www.thomasarmstrong.com/myth_add_adhd.htm
http://www.adhdfraud.org/
You need to dance, always
You're under the microscope. You need to impress the observer otherwise you get thrown out and written off.
So why not dance for the observer?
No you don't make the observer dance, how can you make the observer dance when they're just observing?
So just dance.
Dancing is like showing your true self. Enjoying that release of yourself.
Like dancing it means to just have fun and do what you feel like along with doing what seems appropriate.
So just dance.
Dance for the microscope. They want to see you so show yourself to them.
Dance to show them that you have value.
Don't dance to the ones you don't want to see your value.
Dance your attitude, your personality.
Dance your commitments, dance your job.
Just Dance.
So why not dance for the observer?
No you don't make the observer dance, how can you make the observer dance when they're just observing?
So just dance.
Dancing is like showing your true self. Enjoying that release of yourself.
Like dancing it means to just have fun and do what you feel like along with doing what seems appropriate.
So just dance.
Dance for the microscope. They want to see you so show yourself to them.
Dance to show them that you have value.
Don't dance to the ones you don't want to see your value.
Dance your attitude, your personality.
Dance your commitments, dance your job.
Just Dance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)